FPSS slide image

LALATE: The Latest Celebrity News, Entertainment News, Soccer, Football, World Cup, Scores!

Celebrity News, Hollywood News, Soccer, Football, National News, Live Score, and More. Breaking and Exclusive.

FPSS slide image

Soccer Scores | EPL Table 2015 Results English Premier League

Manchester United, Chelsea, Manchester City | La Liga Table Real Madrid, Barcelona | Bundesliga Bayern Munich | Draw Results

FPSS slide image

The RHOA Reunion - Kenya Moore, NeNe Leakes and Kandi Burruss

Plus Kenya Moore Life Twirls On. The Latest on Porsha Williams And More

FPSS slide image

Dancing with the Stars 2015 Results Tonight | DWTS 2015 Eliminations

Who Got Eliminated on Dancing with the Stars Tonight? Dancing with the Stars 2015 Results & Eliminations

Kim Zolciak Disputes Phaedra Parks, Kandi Burruss Claim: EXCLUSIVE

Posted: June 18th, 2013 in Kandi Burruss, Kim Zolciak, Phaedra Parks by LALATE

Kim Zolciak Disputes Phaedra Parks, Kandi Burruss Claim: EXCLUSIVE

LOS ANGELES (LALATE EXCLUSIVE) – Kim Zolciak is disputing any involvement with Kandi Koated Entertainment, Kandi Burruss’ company, at issue in the song “Don’t Be Tardy for the Party”. Kim asserts that Phaedra Parks, Kandi’s co-counsel, has allegedly left unanswered for the court why Kandi Koated Entertainment, specifically, is suing Kim Zolciak. But is Kim right?

For months, RHOA fans have heard details of the dispute between Kandi and Kim over the Tardy for the Party song. But LALATE can exclusively reveal that Kim is asserting an alleged vacuum of explanation about one issue. Why is Kandi Koated Entertainment suing Kim Zolciak?

Kim is asking that claim(s) by Kandi Koated Entertainment against her be dismissed by the court. Kim asserts “Nowhere in Plaintiffs’ Complaint is it asserted that Kandi Koated Entertainment, Inc. is an owner or an assignee of any copyright interest in the Composition or the Sound Recording”. Kandi disputes the same, however.

Kim further asserts that she raised this issue in her first brief on her motion to dismiss and that Phaedra Parks did not respond to it her brief for Burruss. “This deficiency was noted in Defendant Zolciak-Biermann’s Brief in Support of Her Motion to Dismiss and it was not disputed in Plaintiffs’ Opposition Brief to the same.” But despite Kim’s assertions, the test is whether the issue is detailed in the complaint sufficiently, not in the briefs.

Kim hence asserts that Kandi Koated should be dismissed. “Further, Plaintiffs’ Opposition Brief states the copyright interest in the Sound Recording purportedly owned by Plaintiff Burruss and Plaintiff Richards has never been transferred,2 thus, Plaintiff Kandi Koated Entertainment, Inc. has no legal interest in the Sound Recording at issue and has no basis for stating claims against Defendant Zolciak-Biermann for alleged infringement of the same.”

She also claims “Therefore, even if the court elects not to grant Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss in its entirety, all claims brought on behalf of Kandi Koated Entertainment, Inc. must be dismissed.” The court has yet to rule on the matter.

celebrity news celebrities hollywood
Kandi Burruss, Kim Zolciak, Phaedra Parks

celebrity news celebrities hollywood  the ringer cw sarah michelle gellar
twitter twitter

Latest Comments:

One Response to 'Kim Zolciak Disputes Phaedra Parks, Kandi Burruss Claim: EXCLUSIVE'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. Kimberly Knowles said,

    on June 22nd, 2013 at 2:49 pm

    Phaedra Parks and Kandi Burruss are just crooks and scammers, and just want some change!!

Comment and Contribute:

[Policy Regarding Comments]

celebrity news celebrities hollywood


karina smirnoff playboy photos
danica patrick hot photos
Jessie Lunderby PHOTOS

celebrity news celebrities hollywood

About lalate.com | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Posting Comments | Staff | Contact Us | Feed | Archives
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014
lalate.com - america's fastest growing celebrity news site
Copyright (c), TM 1998-2015 lalate.com. All rights reserved.