website statistics
To Top

Lt John Pike UC Davis Pepper Spray Prompts Historic Occupy Lawsuit

Lt John Pike UC Davis Pepper Spray Prompts Historic Occupy Lawsuit

LOS ANGELES (LALATE) – The Lt John Pike UC Davis Pepper Spray attack from Friday is prompting a historic civil rights lawsuit. Did Lt John Pike act alone in the UC Davis Pepper Spray 2011 attack, or was Pike acting pursuant to instructions by UC Davis and City of Davis officials? That will ultimately be the issue at stake when the victims of the Occupy UC Davis pepper spray attack file suit in the coming days. The victims have not been identified, all of the possible defendants have not been detailed. But the news comes as widespread critics claim that Linda P.B. Katehi, UC Davis’s Chancellor, allegedly has condoned police violence against her students. The allegations, moreover, assert that Katehi is not the only UC Chancellor to allegedly use violence against their own students.

For months, Occupy protesters worldwide have been depicted as being dragged, shoved, carried, and pushed by responding officers. But on Friday, a handful of peaceful, non moving, protesters, sat in quiet civil demonstrations. Lt John Pike, a UC Davis officer, was in position during the dispute. Pike was not the only officer surrounding the students.

In what appeared to be a slow, gradual buildup, Pike had created no urgency between him and the protesters. Dozens of amateur spectators and news reporters stood in position inches from Pike, recording video and photographs.

John Pike Pictures Set 1
John Pike Photo 1

John Pike Photo 2

John Pike Photo 3

John Pike Photo 4

Pike walked behind the protesters. All of them were seated, clustered together, not speaking mostly with their faces down and their hats or hoods over the head. Pike then in grandstanding motion pulled out a pepper spray can. He waved it at the crowd in a threatening gesture. The motioning was slow. There was no urgency.

And then, he positioned himself close to the first protester and began to spray into their eyes. He moved to the next, and then the next. He deliberately insured that pepper spray hit each and every protester, the YouTube video depicts.

John Pike Pictures Set 2
John Pike Photo 5

John Pike Photo 6

John Pike Photo 7

John Pike Photo 8

Nathan Brown, an Assistant Professor in the UC Davis English department, claims that the conduct didn’t end there. He claims that protesters saw the motioning of the pepper spray can coming, and covered their eyes, but that Pike allegedly grabbed the protesters’ mouths, “forced open their mouths”, and insured that he was able to “spray[] down their throats”.

John Pike Pictures Set 3
John Pike Photo 9

John Pike Photo 10

John Pike Photo 11

John Pike Photo 12

Brown says that UC Davis officials have no tolerance for student dissent. He claims a UC Davis November 13 email stated “it is particularly disturbing that such an act of intolerance should occur at a time when the campus community is working to create a safe and inviting space for all our students.”

Brown says that students have a right to “political dissent on our campus”. Brown claims that Pike was ordered by UC Davis officials to prevent expression of speech by students. “You may not order police to forcefully disperse student protesters peacefully protesting police brutality. You may not do so. It is not an option available to you as the Chancellor of a UC campus. That is why I am calling for your immediate resignation.”

John Pike Pictures Set 4
John Pike Photo 13

John Pike Photo 14

John Pike Photo 15

John Pike Photo 16

Pike has yet to comment about the matter. His email, address, Skype, and even annual salary (paid by students) have been posted online. Pike reportedly is paid more than $100,000 from State of California annually with more than 40% of his salary from student fees, claims Occupy UC Davis. Katehi has yet to agree to resign. Occupy UC Davis confirms “Protesters will be engaging civil rights attorneys to pursue legal action against the University and City of Davis for excessive force and for violating their civil and constitutional rights.”


  1. Ralph

    November 21, 2011 at 9:55 pm

    Well Said Martin!
    All ‘democratically elected’ representatives are mere puppets – they no longer represent the majority of voters, they pander to their overlords’ whims.These policemen protect and serve all right – the money men!

  2. mike

    November 22, 2011 at 9:13 am

    what pike has coming to him will happen shortly.just sit back and enjoy it.

  3. Joshua

    December 3, 2011 at 11:37 pm

    This incident will result in filings of 1983 and state tort claims. As the injuries are minimal, the 1983 cliam will probably not succeed. However, it appears that the officer was acting ‘willfully and maliciously’, so a liberal California federal court may allow the plaintiffs to proceed past summary judgment. As for the state tort claims of assault and battery, whether or not they succeed will depend on if plaitiff’s counsel can find a law or regualtion that the officer broke whilst in the commission of his act.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

More in John Pike