Clay Aiken Fans Won’t Be Happy …
Clay Aiken fans won’t be happy what one magazine today said of Clay Aiken. If you are a Clay Aiken fan and have high blood pressure, you might want to stop reading from this point forward, because it’s that bad.
The New York Daily News Jo Piazza wrote an article today (posted at 4 am) that includes a source statement about Clay Aiken.
Not only is the source statement in the article incorrect on Aiken but is downright nasty.
The article’s topic was Ricky Martin’s babies and whether magazines are interested in doing a spread of Martin’s sons.
Piazza writes:
“Word in magazine land is that someone will end up running a photo of Martin (who admitted last week that he is now caring for twin sons delivered through an unnamed surrogate) and his babies somewhere in the glossies, but that the family isn’t cover-worthy.”
She then ads this statement from the source.
” “When someone seems like they are hiding something, it’s a big turnoff to the public, who want to share in celebrities’ lives,” another editor spilled. “No one really cared about Clay Aiken becoming a single dad, either.” “
What?!!
“No one really cared about Clay Aiken becoming a single dad?”
LALATE would like to know what magazine this editor works for to make such an incorrect statement.
Even if the source quote editor lived in vacuum, it takes all of 10 seconds to research online how much people “really cared about Clay Aiken becoming a … dad” online compared to other celebrities in 2008. You even determine which celebrities fans “cared about” more that had magazine baby spreads and those that didn’t. All you do is search and see how many results are for that topic.
Here’s what you find.
Clay Aiken has an many results for “Clay Aiken Baby” 1.4 million as Matthew McConaughey for “Matthew McConaughey Baby” at 1.5 million. And Matthew McConaughey and Camilla Alves had People Magazine publicizing their baby birth with a photo spread! Aiken only had one simple blog post on his fan website.
In fact, Aiken has more results that Usher. And Usher even did a baby photo spread!
Here are other celebrities -
Lisa Marie Presley 1.0 million
Mel C 800,000
Ricky Martin 1.9 million.
Jennifer Garner 2.3 million (2 baby births)
Matt Damon 2.2 (2 baby births)
Clay Aiken, Ricky Martin
|
 |
 |
Latest Comments:
74 Responses to 'Clay Aiken Fans Won’t Be Happy …'
Comment and Contribute:
[Policy Regarding Comments]
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:01 am
Have I told you lately that I love you? Thank you for printing the truth.
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:02 am
Clay Aiken isn’t a single dad. They didn’t even get that part right.
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:48 am
Clay is not married to the mother of his child so he is in fact a single dad whether he, of anyone does not like that title, that is a fact and one they everyone needs to live with.
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:57 am
Clay may be single… and a dad… but not a single parent as he and Jaymes will be raising Parker together. Hmm. I hope that makes sense!
on August 25th, 2008 at 2:12 am
Thanks for an article that has been researched. The New York Daily News must have been turned down by Clay for covering the baby news. How dumb do they think the general public are??
on August 25th, 2008 at 2:34 am
The NYDN is just another in a long line of tabloid papers that are trying to influence public opinion against Clay Aiken. Why? Because he won’t “come out” for them, regardless of the fact that Clay has stated several times that he’s not gay. That doesn’t matter, however, when certain people are convinced that they know so much better than Clay himself.
It always boils down to “my way or the highway.” I’m not sure where these people get the idea that they run the country and can dictate others’ lives. Maybe it’s something in their pastrami sandwiches.
on August 25th, 2008 at 5:09 am
Sometimes you just have to consider the source on these things. Obviously, since Media Outlets from all over the world, all the Entertainment Shows, TMZ, People, Newsweek, Time have all picked up the story, someone is interested. Hell, it even showed up on the crawl on CNN.
Oh and calling Clay a single parent is screwed up semantics. A single parent is a person who is raising their child alone. It is not someone who is in a relationship raising a child together, but unmarried. There really is no comparison between Ricky and Clay’s situation, except in the minds of the tabloids.
Clay’s a pretty private person, especially regarding his family, he may well have turned them down.
Thanks the the accurate reporting LaLate.
on August 25th, 2008 at 6:12 am
Are they nuts? If no one cared about Clay Aiken’s fatherhood, TMZ wouldn’t have published his stolen medical records in the first place!
on August 25th, 2008 at 6:28 am
I am proud of you LaLate. You continue to do your research.
on August 25th, 2008 at 6:56 am
Great to see someone call out those who want to promote an agenda about a celebrity and then use some facts to back it up. There were hundreds of google alerts about the baby–before and after the birth. It was on all the news. Yep, no one is interested. Thanks for telling it like it is!!
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:26 am
Love You lalate
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:31 am
that reporter is just wack. If nobody cared they wouldn’t have use his name
I like this site because you call it like it is.
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:56 am
Does this mean they won’t try to invade the family’s privacy, looking for pictures no one is interested in? Somehow, I doubt it.
on August 25th, 2008 at 8:06 am
Yep, no one cared – that’s why there are only 1.4 million searches for the news of Clay Aiken’s baby. Someone at the NYDN obviously has their head on backwards.
Thank you, LALATE, for telling it like it is.
And – congratulations to Clay, Jaymes (the MOTHER of his child, who will be raising the child WITH Clay) and to little Parker.
on August 25th, 2008 at 8:34 am
I guess, if Clay is a single parent, that makes Brad a single parent also. People need to get real. Clay and Jaymes (she is a girl) will be raising Parker together.
With all of the searches on the internet and all of the intertainment and morning shows covering the birth, you cannot tell me that no one is interested.
LALATE – You are great!
on August 25th, 2008 at 8:46 am
I love you guys. You tell the truth.
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:08 am
what can you expect from a rag who don’t get they fact straight.
first he is not a single dad, they are raisingthe child together and his situation and Ricky’s are very different. in Ricky case a surrogate mother was paid to carry the child and have no right to the kids.
nobody care about Clay aiken? he was in all the entetainment sites and magazines and 1.4 millions hits is not too shabby either.
thank’s Lalate for doing your homework,
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:35 am
thank you Lalate.
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Thank you, lalate, for bringing the TRUTH.
I knew you wouldn’t let us – and Clay – down.
Bless you!
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:56 am
Brad and Angelina are a couple in a committed relationship(though I think they should make their commitment official because I don’t think it sends a good message to teens or their Children) Clay and Jaymes according to what Clay said are friends, it isn’t the same as Brads situation. so that makes them single parents.. No one knows what their definition of raising a child together means or their reasons behind being a child into the world in this manner, so I won’t comment on that… but the fact remains they are by every definition single parents and single parent isn’t a 4 letter word.
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Here is a link to the definition of Single Parent for those who don’t seem to understand what it means
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_parent
Clay nor Jaymes ever stated they would be living together, and that would be a rather odd situation if they are not a couple and want to date other people..not just confusing for the people they would date, but for the child as well. Clay is not perfect, he can make choices that to some people may not be the best choice and those people can like and care for him, just not agree with his choices. There are many married couples who divorce and then choose not to date until their children are grown because of the negative effect dating has on their children, and the time it takes away from their child. Who knows how this situation will play itself out, not even Clay and Jaymes can really know unless they have a crystal ball. We all said what we would do as parents when weren’t parents…neither Clay nor Jaymes had any experience being parent before they made this choice(sorry babysitting is not the same as being a parent) but reality is a whole other story and sometimes it can come around and kick you in the butt
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:35 am
What it boils down to is that media types /bloggers who are unable to come up with anything clever , interesting or amusing from their own brains and are too lazy to research a story just fling out some names that will bring them hits . Sad .
All the best to Clay , Jaymes and their baby boy .
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:41 am
Clay values his privacy and I hope this will allow him to live his life in peace.
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:58 am
” Kim said,
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:35 am
What it boils down to is that media types /bloggers who are unable to come up with anything clever , interesting or amusing from their own brains and are too lazy to research a story just fling out some names that will bring them hits . Sad .
All the best to Clay , Jaymes and their baby boy “.
I agree
on August 25th, 2008 at 11:18 am
Well, LG, by the definition of “single parent” you linked to… Clay is not a single parent. So, I’m really confused by your argument. Does it really matter anyways how people want to define “single parent” and whether they apply the term to Clay or not? The real point of this article is whether people are interested in the story about Clay’s baby or not. I say the New York Daily News is whack and sounds like sour grapes to me!
on August 25th, 2008 at 11:56 am
It is all semantics on the term “single” parent. Single means “one”. Clay has stated he & Jaymes would be raising the child “together”. This is not “one”. Whatever their relationship is, & I don’t believe they will be telling, I wish them the best !
on August 25th, 2008 at 12:21 pm
It’s just a stupid article. Clay and Ricky’s situation are completely different. I haven’t heard any other celebs called a single parent unless they truly are. Sheryl Crow adopted and is raising her child on her own( shes a single parent). Clay has said he and Jaymes are raising the baby together.
on August 25th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
This article cracks me up because on one hand they say no one is interested whether Clay is a dad or not. If they think people aren’t interested then why are they mentioning him?
I wish Clay and Jaymes all the good wishes that come with having a child.
on August 25th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
The NYDN article was strange. I’m sorry but if Ricky Martin’s babies or Clay Aiken’s baby was in People, they would sell magazines. The reporter came off as a reporter scorned in the non article. Thanks for being real LaLate.
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Hey, LG! Which one is the “single parent?” Clay or Jaymes? Does that make them two single parents raising their son together? Were your mother and father two single parents raising you?
Try to follow along.
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Sour grapes all the way. Clay won’t talk to them so this is how they retaliate. Bunch of woosies.
on August 25th, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Lalate, you did it again! If you keep on printing well-researched, thruthful articles like this one, you’ll be kicked out of the journalism club
Thanks again for an honest report.
PS – LOVE the Clay video!
on August 25th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
I’ve been a fan of Clay from the beginning but I have to admit I am put off by his artifically inseminating his “best friend”. No matter how his other fans try to sugar coat this, it is what it is and he’s a single parent. He’s probably coming back to Spamalot to “get out of Dodge,” i.e, the Bible Belt.
on August 25th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Sorry grace, but that kind of reasoning doesn’t wash. Fact is, Clay and Jaymes are raising their child together. The exact nature of their relationship and the manner in which Jaymes got pregnant is not relevant to whether he is a “single” parent or not… per actual definition of “single parent”, no matter how you try to twist it.
on August 25th, 2008 at 3:05 pm
I agree that the NY Daily News is just jealous that they won’t have a chance at a baby story from Jaymes and Clay Aiken, so they put down the whole notion that other magazines are interested. Every time Clay has been featured in or on a magazine they have sold a huge number of copies. If there isn’t a feature story it will be because Clay and Jaymes said no to one.
Simple as that.
on August 25th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Deona,
Sorry if you feel I “twisted” anything. If you’re not married, you’re single. It’s as simple as that.
on August 25th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
grace, you have to separate being single from be a “single parent”. Single because you are not married is not the same as being a single parent. Kind of like all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. So, since Clay and Jaymes will be raising their son together… neither are “single parents” even if they are both single because they are not marrried.
on August 25th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Clay and Jaymes never said they would be raising the Child together in the same household…If one parent is the primary care giver then they are Single parents by definition. What has been supposedly confirmed is they are just close friends who are not romantically involved…much different from couples that have children but choose not to marry. If they are in fact not a couple then it would be better for the child to get use to the fact his parents will not always be together in the same household should they chose to pursue other relationships. No one knows why they chose to bring a child into the world this way, and I am not going to venture to guess. I only care that the child is loved and gets a lot of attention from the people who brought him into the world. .
on August 25th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
The whole article just makes me laugh. Clay probably wouldn’t give them the time of day and they didn’t like it.
on August 25th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Necile said,
on August 25th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
“Hey, LG! Which one is the “single parent?” Clay or Jaymes? Does that make them two single parents raising their son together? Were your mother and father two single parents raising you?
Try to follow along.”
My parents were married, not single.
I don’t know who will be the primary caregiver, but if they are not raising the child in the same household, then they are raising him as single parents.
Brad and Angelina are raising their children as a committed couple living in the same household so they are not referred to as single parents(maybe not fair, but that is the way it is, and personally I think if they are so committed to each other, they should extended that commitment to marriage out of respect for their children). …Maybe you should try to follow along
on August 25th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Perhaps the NYDN meant to imply that no magazines (incorrectly, I think) were interested rather than that no potential readers were interested. If pictures of baby Parker were to surface, just how quickly do you think they would be posted/printed?
I believe that Clay and Jaymes have a relationship based on trust and respect and that they are committed to raising Parker in a safe, healthy and loving environment, with both families involved, even if they are not always living in the same household.
Thanks, lalate.
on August 25th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
LG, you are assuming that they will not be raising the child in the same household. You don’t know that. As far as we know, and what was reported, was that they would be raising Parker together. I really don’t know why we are arguing the point since we do not know all the facts about their relationship. You cannot state **as a fact** that Clay will be a single parent. You can **assume** that he will be, but not state it as a fact.
on August 25th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
LG, just wondering how do you know Clay and Jaymes aren’t living in the same household? That’s a pretty big assumption, certainly not based on any fact
on August 25th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
I think there were so many hits on the news of Clay’s baby when it broke, because his fans couldn’t believe it was true. He had always said not to believe rumors and then he did a complete about face.
It’s unfortunate that those who are not compromising their own moral convictions by congratulating Clay are being condemned. If you are unmarried and not in a committed same-household relationship and have a child, then you are a single parent. If you are divorced and raising a child without a spouse, then you are a single parent. Why are people offended by the words and not by the action? Jaymes has two homes on the West coast and a career of her own. I doubt that she intends to stay at home in NC to parent with Clay. It will be interesting to see how it all turns out. It’s their life…….actually who does care how they live it???
on August 25th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
lalate, you guys are a class act! Not only are they cover worthy, Clay and Jaymes are raising their son together as a family. It doesn’t compare at all to Ricky’s situation. Jaymes is very much involved in the upbringing of her child. I’m sure they’ll all be together in NYC when Clay returns to Spamalot. I don’t know that they’ll go the cover route, but I do hope we get a baby pic!
on August 25th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
Deona said,
on August 25th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
“LG, you are assuming that they will not be raising the child in the same household. You don’t know that. As far as we know, and what was reported, was that they would be raising Parker together. I really don’t know why we are arguing the point since we do not know all the facts about their relationship. You cannot state **as a fact** that Clay will be a single parent. You can **assume** that he will be, but not state it as a fact.”
Many of his fans are assuming they will be raising Parker in the same household when they don’t know the facts. Many divorced parents raise their children together, but don’t live in the same household and they are considered single parents. Just because they said they would rise them together, does not mean they will do so in the same household…and please don’t say Clay would never not be with his son everyday…you don’t know what Clay might do because you don’t know him…I bet if someone ask you if he would start a family in this manner, you would have said no and you would have been wrong. I don’t know his reasoning, and he doesn’t have to share it with me or the public. You all are treating the word Single Parent like it was a dirty word…Clay is not married to Jaymes, and according to everything printed in the media and on his on blog, they are very good friends, and nothing more. There could be many reasons why this decision was made and that is between them, it could be something we might all understand regardless of how we might think now…the heart has a way of making us look at things differently. Clay may find and fall in love with the woman he has been searching for next month, and then they will all have to figure out how all of them will give Parker the best of each of them, because whatever happens Parker’s well being should be number 1 above anyone and anything else.
on August 25th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
deej, you are making a whole lot presumptions about the fans and Clay. I don’t think anyone is offended by the words, so to speak, just the semantics and the presumptions behind them. Like you said, who cares whether they are married or not? People are just saying that one cannot presume that they will not parent Parker together when so far, everything indicates that they will. If it turns out differently… then c’est la vie. Until then, let us not presume otherwise. And Clay did not do a complete about face about rumors. Did he ever say we should believe them? More like we shouldn’t believe them until they are confirmed. Just so happened this particular rumor ended up being true. It happens sometimes. Doesn’t mean we should believe all rumors about Clay from now on. Yet again another presumption on your part.
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:00 pm
LG, good grief. You also make a whole lot of presumptions. The whole discussion is over the definition of single parent, which you misrepresented, and whether they will live together or not. Who knows. You are making assumptions about what Clay is going to do and in the same breath condemning other fans for making different assumptions than yourself.
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
It’s refreshing to visit an entertainment site that isn’t full of nasty stories. Keep up the good work Lalate!
For what it’s worth, supposedly Faye Parker has stated that Clay, Jaymes and Parker will be moving to NYC after Parker’s 6 week check up. Raising the baby together means raising the baby in one household. We do not know the level of Clay’s and Jayme’s feelings for one another. It’s their personal life. Good match, I’d say.
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:35 pm
Thanks LALate for backing up your story with real facts. Refreshing!
on August 25th, 2008 at 7:37 pm
lalate, you are a breath of fresh air in an otherwise ugly media world of articles about Clay. Thank goodness for someone who is finally calling these tabloids what they are: mean-spirited, scandalous, and disgraceful…out to make money at the expense of another’s reputation.
When I first read this comment from the NYDN earlier today, my first thought, obviously, was, “Are you kidding me? The news about Clay’s baby reached far and wide after TMZ spilled this story (without Clay’s permission of course), and after Parker was born, it was all over the country and even around the world.” And they have the audacity to say no one cared about it? What cave have they been living in for the last few months?
on August 25th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Good luck, Clay! You and Jaymes are going to be great parents to your little tyke, Parker! Clay has always been a private person. These paparazzo went all the way to his hometown and started snapping videos of the family as they left the hospital. There must be some insider who alerted them or they’re just equipped with long-ranged antennas! Well, LALATE, Clay will surely be appreciative of you for straigthening out this twisted story concocted by roach brain media! Moreover, you are the only site that I’m sure Clay fans respect! Clay, best of luck to you and Jaymes!
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:16 pm
You keep telling it like it IS LaLate. WE know you are actually telling the truth unlike a lot of media out there today. thankyou.
I hope Clay and Jaymes do some sort of professional photo spread. I want their baby to be seen on their terms not the paparazzi terms.
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
You keep telling it like it IS LaLate. WE know you are actually telling the truth unlike a lot of media out there today. thankyou.
I hope Clay Aiken and Jaymes Foster do some sort of professional photo spread. I want their baby to be seen on their terms not the paparazzi terms.
on August 25th, 2008 at 9:45 pm
“Jaymes has two homes on the West coast and a career of her own. I doubt that she intends to stay at home in NC to parent with Clay.”
Where on earth did you come to THAT conclusion? Do you honestly think a 50-year-old woman who had to go through extensive IVF and the risks involved is just going to dump off her child and go on her merry way? She obviously wanted that child very badly.
Some people are acting like Jaymes just did this as a favor to Clay. Did it ever occur to you that it might have been the other way around? I’m sure Clay could have found someone who would not have had to go through so much difficulty if he was simply looking for a surrogate. He could have also just adopted.
I suspect some of you work for the NYDN.
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:16 pm
Wow–I was afraid to click on this Google alert because it sounded like my favorite celeb-site was dissing Clay!
….I should have know better!
Keep up the good work, Lalate! *thumbsup*
on August 25th, 2008 at 10:47 pm
LG said…
” What has been supposedly confirmed is they are just close friends who are not romantically involved…”
Wrong. He said that they are very close friends. He said nothing about not being romantically involved….so we don’t know if they are or not.
on August 25th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
Thanks Lalate for sorting through the muck for us and calling it as you see it. I wish more media sites would have your ethics. I’m sure a cover photo of Parker would be a big seller but Clay does prefer his privacy so I wouldn’t count on it only because of that reason. I just hope the papparazi will give up and leave Clay, Jaymes and Parker alone.
on August 25th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
I highly doubt that Clay and Jaymes would be willing to sell pics of Parker to any magazine for any price. I think Clay, especially, would see that as exploitation…and he is all about protecting children.
on August 25th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Clay Aiken and Jaymes Foster are raising their son together, and many, many people are happy for them, wish them well, and would love to see photos. The NYDN reporter is completely wrong. Thank you, LaLate, for publishing the truth.
on August 26th, 2008 at 2:31 am
Thanks, LaLate, for stepping up to the plate and correcting the untruths about our guy. Just love the way you handled the whole issue. It looks like some of the clayfans are just as confused as the media. lol
For the record, IMHO, I think people who profess to be ‘the dearest of friends’ can be just as committed and suited to each other as those who shout their supposed love for each other from the highest mountain tops. People who are ‘the dearest of friends ‘ usually have a high level of respect for each other and have learned to shrug off the minor irritations that would upset others and focus on the positive aspects of their relationship.
The word ‘love’ is used way too often in casual celebrity relationships and can sometimes doom a relationship before it gets off the ground ( given the media’s intrusion of privacy). Clay and Jaymes are being more realistic; as ‘dear friends ‘ they can raise Foster together, have the right to pursue their own career goals and be as close to each other as they want…without the continual harassment of the celeb mags who love to focus on marriages and breakups.
on August 26th, 2008 at 3:18 am
I have a feeling that there is a romance there.
on August 26th, 2008 at 10:24 am
LaLate,
You are a breath of fresh air when it comes to the truth! unlike the rag mags who love to twist the truth and publish crap.
kfccanada loved your whole post!!!
Clay and Jaymes congrats on your new precious bundle..
on August 26th, 2008 at 10:38 am
I think this child will have great parents in Jaymes and Clay. I wish them all the best. Clay loves children and he will make an amazing dad. As far as the article goes, it is just one writers opinion and who cares.. I know I don’t. Thanks LaLate for being fair and honest and telling the truth.
on August 26th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Just because lots of people searched for information regarding the artificially created spawn of Clay Aiken, it does not mean they approved of the situation or were interested in him. It was just a really bizarre story. Unfortunately for the poor child, who will be teased mercilessly, the story was true.
on August 26th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
What is so bizarre about invitro, Stephanie? Oh, yeah. You are one of those sick people who haunt the internet trying to hurt others. It’s obvious when you use terms such as “artifically created spawn.”
And, yes, obviously people go in search of Clay Aiken because they are totally uninterested in him.
on August 26th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Well, well, Clay, shouldn’t you be singing EIDN to these people who claim to know everything? There are more people who care about you, Clay! Once again, best of luck to both of you!
on August 28th, 2008 at 8:08 am
If there was any romance associated with this relationship, then a normal man would refer to the woman who just bore his child as the wonderful woman who I love/adore, not a “dear friend”……..unless he’s ashamed of the whole situation.
As for searching for celebrity news, it has nothing to do with respect or admiration for that person, just curiosity for the bizarre.
on August 28th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
deej, maybe if you’d quit projecting your own insecurities and shortcomings onto Clay and Jaymes, the situation wouldn’t seem so bizarre.
on August 28th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
“maybe if you’d quit projecting your own insecurities and shortcomings onto Clay and Jaymes, the situation wouldn’t seem so bizarre.”
I think they obviously have enough of their own; they don’t need any help from me. It doesn’t seem bizarre, it is bizarre. Only his blind followers are fooled.
on August 28th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Hey, LaLate, maybe you would like to take a look at this blog and do a story on people like deej and Stephanie who obviously are participants with an agenda:
http://thetruthaboutclayaiken.blogspot.com/2008/04/hate-and-envy-can-rot-your-soul.html
on August 29th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Because the haters are with us always, it’s great LALATE does its part to spread the good word about our favorite Idol. Thanks!
on August 29th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Theres more than one person who can pretty much verify they are a couple. Just because theyd rathern keepn any realtionship they have between them and family thats there business PERIOD!! I take being made to feel we are blind or stupid an insult. I go with my gutt and I know they truly care about each other. And Faye has said they will be moving to NY to be with each other when hes doing Spamalot. So obviously they are very much living together and plan on rasing their son TOGETHER! Hes NOT ashamed of Jaymes or their son Parker …I wouldnt want the media and ignorant people all in my realtionship either. They have a right to have a private life together. Clay could care less what rude and ignorant people got to say. Right now hes got Jaymes and Parker to worry about and take care of. Theres always gonna be people who get off on talking shit and he realizes thats part of life not everyone is gonna like himn or his choices. And it takes courage to go after your dream and say to hell with what people say or think. Hes done it in his music career and now hes done it in his personal life by becoming a father with Jaymes who he soo obivously cares for. With how much problmes result with the media and things get involvled in celeb realtionships its a very very good idea that he and jaymes keep whatever their realtionship is between them and their love ones. Clays mama faye and jaymes family and friends are obviously very happy,excited , and supportive of Clay,Jaymes and their son so who gives a rats butt about those who want to talke smack. As the saying goes…those that matter dont mind and those that mind dont matter. Congrats again to Clay and Jaymes!!
Cant beleive Parker is three weeks old!!
D
on August 30th, 2008 at 10:53 am
Well, the fact that you showed up on this site to trash Clay some more just proves that the LALATE is accurate