Yes, you read the title of this story right. Oscar de La Hoya is reportedly the defendant, not the plaintiff, in a $100 milllion lawsuit over fishnet stockings! Sound fishy?

Reuters is reporting that a New York woman has filed a $100 million suit against the boxer claiming she was coerced into agreeing not to sell photographs of La Hoya in fishnets in a hotel room.

How was she coerced?

Plaintiff Milana Dravnel, 22, said a representative of de la Hoya coerced her into signing a contract which blocked her from “selling or discussing” the pictures she took of the 34-year-old boxer says Reuters.

Huh?

The lawsuit claims la Hoya sought the contract with Dravnel “in an effort to stonewall (her) effort to sell the pictures taken by her”.

How did he coerce her? (This is where it gets good.)

Dravnel claims she was “vulnerable to coercion by de la Hoya’s representatives because she and the boxer had been in an ‘intimate relationship’ ” reports Reuters.

Intimiate?

Was that intimate in or not in fishnet?

She said she was “unaware of the legal consequences of the transaction” and signed the contract without a lawyer. She is getting her legal boxing gloves on and is suing for fraud, defamation, interfering with a contract, and exerting undue and intentional infliction of emotional distress.